Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anastasia Piangerelli vs Briana Szabo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Piangerelli vs Szabo analysis and find out who is favored!
Anastasia Piangerelli vs Briana Szabo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Piangerelli 1 - 0 Szabo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Piangerelli has won 41.89% of points on his second serve, while Szabo has won 47.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Piangerelli, in recent form, has won 56.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Szabo has won 57.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.03% and 36.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Piangerelli has saved 43.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Szabo has saved 54.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Piangerelli has won 55% of matches played (W/L 22/ 18), with Szabo winning 37.5% (W/L 12/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Piangerelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Szabo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 29/ 26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Piangerelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9), where as Szabo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 9/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Piangerelli winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Piangerelli winning 2 and Szabo winning 1. The last match between Piangerelli and Szabo was at the W15 Cairo, 31-08-2022, First, Clay with Anastasia Piangerelli getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Piangerelli and Szabo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Piangerelli winning 1 times and Szabo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Piangerelli winning 0, and Szabo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Piangerelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 142.88 while Szabo has played against players with an average rank of 88.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Piangerelli has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Szabo has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Piangerelli has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Szabo has converted 42.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
875
Rank
868
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
891
Rank
691
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
49% (87-89)
Career Total W/L
51% (68-66)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Piangerelli VS Szabo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anastasia Piangerelli | Briana Szabo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:1:0 | 3:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (58/99) | 60% (66/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (39/58) | 58% (38/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (18/41) | 41% (18/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (54/110) | 42% (42/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Piangerelli VS Szabo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Briana Szabo
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anastasia Piangerelli | Briana Szabo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 38% (5/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) | 41% (11/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (110/124) | 45% (107/129) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 5 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:32 | 1:42:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.73 | 126.08 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (486/708) | 65% (505/774) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (266/486) | 55% (279/505) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (93/222) | 49% (131/269) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (49/98) | 43% (40/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (351/767) | 44% (355/810) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (4/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Anastasia Piangerelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
73%
(
78 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
79)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
52 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
124)
112
Total Points Won
119
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Fossa Huergo
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
54%
(
45 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Maria Serban
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Piangerelli
Player
Natalie Barbir
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Podrez
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlada Mincheva
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lavinia Tanasie
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Briana Szabo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Briana Szabo
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
65%
(
20 of
31)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Briana Szabo
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Briana Szabo
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
11
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alisa Kummel
Player
Briana Szabo
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Briana Szabo
Player
Giuliana Bestetti
71%
(
82 of
116)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Briana Szabo
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Irina Khromacheva
Player
Briana Szabo
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleejah Inisan
Player
Briana Szabo
62%
(
89 of
143)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
41%
(
22 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
68 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Briana Szabo
Player
Sarah Victoria Majesty Nita
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Briana Szabo
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Piangerelli Vs Szabo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Briana Szabo
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
